Why are many creators only appreciated after they die?
There's a popular opinion that the best artist is a dead artist. A bit brutal, but just look at history: how many painters lived in poverty during their lifetime, only for their paintings to reach astronomical prices after they were gone?
Maybe the artist was ahead of their time
Van Gogh reportedly sold only one painting in his lifetime. His style was too bold and "strange" for late-19th-century audiences. Only later did he become a symbol of expression and colour.
Sometimes it's about... chance and luck
Henri Rousseau was a customs officer for most of his life. He painted in his spare time. Only near the end of his life was he noticed by Picasso and the Parisian avant-garde circle. If it hadn't been for that coincidence, perhaps nobody would have heard of him today.
And sometimes — it's about the person's own story
Frida Kahlo had exhibitions during her lifetime, but her true worldwide fame only came decades after her death, once her biography became an inspiration and a symbol of strength in art.
Society often needs time to "get used to" a new way of looking at art.
The art market runs on fashion — after an artist's death, their body of work becomes a "limited resource."
Sometimes an artist simply had no luck, no contacts, no good promoter.
I hope I won't have to wait for posthumous fame. I'd like to be an artist whose paintings are needed here and now.
Because creating is my everyday life, not a chapter in an art history textbook.
I believe that — and I get signs from the universe (because how else would I?!).
I trust that if you follow your heart and do what flows straight from within you, that's the right path.
We'll see how my own story turns out...


Comments
No comments yet. Be the first!